Occupation Map

Occupation Map

Tuesday, 24 November 2015

PSC take legal action against Co-op Bank for closing accounts

PSC along with 20 local groups working for Palestine (including 10 PSC branches) have had their bank accounts unilaterally closed by the Co-operative bank. The reason? The Co-op bank say they've changed their "risk appetite". Apparently Palestinian human rights are too "risky" for the Co-operative bank.

Well we're not having it. Today we've launched a legal case against the Co-operative bank calling this what it is - discrimination.  As well as taking legal action we need you to stand with us and show the Co-op bank that campaigning for Palestinian human rights shouldn't be punished.

If you have an account with the Co-op bank, write to tell them you're closing it because of their actions

So many of us opened our accounts with the Co-operative Bank because they market themselves as an ethical alternative. Professing their moral high ground in their ethical policy they proclaim to act with "honesty and transparency," to treat their "customers fairly" and to believe in "promoting human rights and equality". Well there is little evidence of any of these principles today.

They have chosen to close the accounts of 20 organisations working for human rights and equality for Palestinians - and they have offered no honest or transparent explanation, only citing the banking jargon "risk appetite".

It is quite clear the Co-operative Bank no longer cares about human rights - the Palestinians suffer incursions on their human rights day in, day out at the hands of an occupying military force that continues to violate international law. In the UK we have a great tradition of solidarity organisations coming together to stand against human rights violations throughout the world - this is something that the Co-operative Bank should support, not punish.

To those who still bank with the Co-op because of their ethical principles - it seems they have turned their bank on their ethics, so we are asking you to turn your back on them.

Close your Co-op bank account and write to them to tell them why.

For suggestions of alternative banks, visit www.moveyourmoney.org.uk. While their ethical banking page still lists the Co-op (don't worry we're writing to them about this) they do offer other alternative options.

Moving bank account is a big decision - and we know it can be a real pain! But we need to show big businesses they can't profit off of fake ethics. If they believe in human rights and equality - that includes Palestine too.

Thursday, 12 November 2015

Palestinian medical experts refused entry to UK for conference - please write to your MP

From PSC 

Dear friend

The UK Government is facing fierce condemnation from campaigners for refusing permission for Palestinian medical experts to attend an academic conference.

Five Palestinian medical experts had their visas refused by the British Authorities.
Anecdotally it appears that an increasing number of Palestinians are having their visas to the UK refused by the British Government.

Write to your MP and ask them to protest against this decision and to call for a review of our visa arrangements with Israel and Palestine

One of those denied entry was a psychologist from Bethlehem. An Israeli from the illegal settlement of Har Homa - about half a mile from Bethlehem - would have been able to enter the UK freely without even applying for a British visa.

It is not as easy for UK citizens to visit Israel as it for Israeli settlers to visit the UK. The UK Government is failing to publicly protest against British citizens being prevented from entering Israel and the Palestinian territories. And the Israeli Parliament is threatening to pass a law banning supporters of boycott  from travelling to Israel or - in effect - the occupied territories.

Write to your MP today and ask them to protest against:

Palestinians being prevented from travelling to the UK, with reference to these medical experts prevented from attending this academic conference

Israeli settlers being given free rein to travel to the UK

The growing threat of UK citizens being denied entry to the occupied Palestinian territories to see the situation for themselves
Please write to your MP today and ask for your MP to protest.

Wednesday, 11 November 2015

Nov 15th: “Can there be peace in the Holy Land?”: A talk given by Sir Vincent Fean, Retired British Consul General, Jerusalem




From  The London Inter Faith Centre

When:
November 15, 2015 @ 6:00 pm – 7:30 pm
Where:
London Inter Faith Centre
Saint Annes & Saint Andrews Church
125 Salusbury Road, London NW6 6RG
UK
Cost:
Donation £5
Contact:
Laurence Hillel
07801286819
 
 
The first of a series of talks on Global issues on Sunday evenings.
After a long career in the British Diplomatic Service, Sir Vincent Fean retired in early 2014 as Consul General, Jerusalem. That post entailed promoting UK interests and dealing with President Abbas, the PLO leadership and Ministers of the Palestinian Authority. Before his 3 year Jerusalem posting, Vincent was British Ambassador to Libya (2006–‐10) and High Commissioner to Malta (2002–‐06), where he was knighted by Her Majesty the Queen in 2005.  Vincent is a trustee of the British charity Medical Aid for Palestinians, and patron of the Britain Palestine Friendship and Twinning Network. He advocates UK Government and European recognition of the State of Palestine, as a step towards a just and peaceful end to The Occupation begun in 1967, and fulfilment of the aim of two states – Israel and Palestine – living side by side in mutual security.

Sunday, 8 November 2015

Upcoming Brent and Harrow PSC Meetings

Joint Brent STW and Brent  & Harrow PSC Meeting
How can there be Peace in Palestine/Israel?
Speaker: John Rose [Author of The Myths of Zionism]
Monday, November 9th at 7.30pm
 Brent Trades Hall (London Apollo Club)
375 High Rd, Willesden, NW10 2JR
[It’s very close to Willesden Bus Garage, buses 6, 52, 98, 226, 260,
266, 302, 460 and just five minutes’ walk from Dollis Hill
Jubilee Line station]

Meeting organised by Brent Friends of Palestine
HELP   GAZA’S   CHILDREN HAVE   A   CHILDHOOD
373,000 children in Gaza need therapeutic support as a result of years of conflict.  (UNICEF 2015)
Help Brent Friends of Palestine raise funds to buy a bus for the Palestine Trauma Centre.
Come and hear   David  Harrold,  Chair of Palestine Trauma Centre
Songs by Leon Rosselson
Tuesday 10th November at 7.30pm
North London Tavern
375 Kilburn Park Rd
Kilburn Jubilee Line     Brondesbury  Overground
Buses 16,32,189,316,332

Meeting organised by Brent & Harrow  PSC,  Brent STW & An-Nisa
Prevent:  Protecting our Liberties
December 10th 
Speakers invited Bill Bolloten (Education not Surveillance)
Khalida Khan (An-Nisa)
Rob Ferguson (NUT)
Malia Bouattia (NUS)
Kiri Tuks (PSC)
Shahrar Ali (Brent Green Party)
Cllr James Denselow (Lead Member for Stronger Communities)
Further details later

Tuesday, 1 September 2015

Victory as Veolia pulls out of its remaining contracts with Israel

August 2013 (from the now defunct Wembley and Willesden Observer
 Brent Palestine Solidarity members and supporters will be pleased to hear that Veolia is pulling out of all its contracts in Israel. We fought a campaign against Veolia getting a multi-million Brent Council Public Realm contract in the latter half of 2013 LINK  because of its activities in the Occupied Territories and provision of infrastructural support for illegal settlements.

We lost that battle but our campaign made many more people aware of what was happening in Israel and the Occupied Territories and added to Veolia's embarrassment.

This is the message from the PSC Campaigns Officer:
We’ve got some fantastic news.
Veolia has just announced that it is completely pulling out of its contracts with Israeli apartheid! This is a huge victory for solidarity with Palestine and the BDS movement and sends a clear message to other companies – doing business with Israel risks your reputation and profit.
The campaign against Veolia notched up major successes with Veolia losing major contracts. The pressure from campaigns like ours was too much and today they announced they’re selling the Light Rail shares too! That means Veolia has completely withdrawn from Israeli apartheid, exactly what our campaign wanted them to do.  
So we just wanted to say thank you.
A victory like this only happens because of the people involved. This couldn't have happened without you. We’ve won because of the dedication of PSC activists and supporters, all of the other campaigners we work with in the UK, in Palestine, and people around the world.
When I spoke to Sarah Colborne, our Director she agreed, “this victory is thanks to years of hard work from activists and campaigners in the UK joining together with people around the world to stand up for Palestinian rights. This just shows that when we act together for justice we can achieve great things.”
Thank you for everything you do.
Today we’ve shown that we have the power to stop companies who choose to put profit over human lives. We have succeeded in ending the devastating effect Veolia was having on Palestinian lives. I hope you’ll join me in standing in solidarity with other struggles against Veolia across the world. We’ve won against Veolia in Palestine, let’s make sure we connect Veolia’s actions in Palestine with what it’s doing in other countries.
By being part of our campaigns, like the one against Veolia, you are supporting justice and equality, and standing up against racism and occupation. You have helped to win this campaign and grow our movement and we can’t thank you enough.
We’ve stood up to a powerful corporation and won. So enjoy the success and take the bank holiday to celebrate. Then let’s use that energy to win the ultimate campaign for a free Palestine!
Rachel Diamond
Campaigns Officer
We can only win campaigns like this because of donations from people like you.

Tuesday, 11 August 2015

Labour leadership candidates' positions on Palestine

The Palestine Solidarity Campaign is not aligned to any political party. However, PSC members and supporters taking part in the Labour leadership election may be interested in the following:

Palestine Briefing
parliamentary newsletter and briefing service
160 London Road, Kingston KT2 6QW

What the Labour leadership candidates say on key Palestinian issues
 


Bradshaw Creasy Eagle Flint Watson
Are settlements illegal? Yes - - - -
UK recognise Palestine Yes Yes Yes Yes -
Lift blockade of Gaza? Yes Yes - - -
Stop settlement trade? Yes - - - -
Suspend tariff reductions? - - - - -
Stop arms sales? - - - - -
Labour Friends of Palestine asked the candidates for the leadership and deputy leadership of the Labour Party for their views on six issues - recognising Palestine, lifting the blockade of Gaza, the illegality of the settlements and of building the wall on Palestinian land, detention without trial and a peace process based on the 1967 borders.
 
They also asked the candidates for a statement of their views on the Palestinian issue. Most of them have now put up statements on the Labour Friends of Palestine website here and also the deputy leadership candidates here but few of them have directly answered the questions put to them.
 
It is Labour Party policy to recognise the state of Palestine and most of the candidates voted for recognition in the backbench debate in the House of Commons October last year. Liz Kendall was asked about this and made it clear that she abstained deliberately. 
 
Both the Labour and the Government front benches condemn the settlements as "illegal" and call for the lifting of the blockade of Gaza. 
 
The other issues - stopping settlement trade, suspending tariff reductions and stopping arms sales - are all ways in which pressure could be brought to bear on the Israeli government to stop breaking international law by building settlements or blockading Gaza, but none of them has yet been adopted by either front bench.
 
The UK's policy on arms sales is not to sell arms that could be used for internal repression or to take land by force, but the Government announced last month that it had decided to take no action on its review of arms licenses to Israel after last year's Gaza war.
 
The above tables have been compiled from their statements on the Labour Friends of Palestine website, their answers (if any) to the PSC questionnaire during the election campaign, the House of Commons vote on recognition (if they attended) and the Jewish Labour Movement hustings on July 20th (see below).
 
Here are highlights from what the candidates said at those hustings:

Extracts from the Jewish Chronicle Labour leadership hustings on July 20th
 
Andy Burnham: Recognition: “In the parliamentary vote on recognition I voted for it, but I don’t think it was handled well.  I don’t think it should have been a whipped vote and also I think that the motion lacked balance.”
 
Two-state solution: “It has gone backwards in recent times. It can’t be the case that we as politicians just mouth our support for the two-state solution without actually willing the means. I don’t consider myself a friend of the current Israeli government. [Netanyahu’s comments before the last Israeli election about Arabs ‘swarming to the polls’] were provocative, derogatory and highly offensive.”
 
Boycott: “We should be absolutely clear about being opposed to [talk of a boycott]. It would show a kind of spitefulness that would be completely and utterly unjustified when we are talking about a democracy that has a long tradition of supporting minorities and civil rights.”
 
Visits: [He recalled previous visits with both Labour Friends of Israel and Labour Friends of Palestine] “I think we need to reach out and show we are listening to people in the [Jewish] community. The first foreign visit I would do would be to Israel.”
 
Balfour declaration: “Schools have been required by law to teach about British values. As part of this centenary [of the Balfour Declaration in 2017], we would want a whole series of events in every school in the country to say how British values did shape a modern democracy in the region. We should be very proud of that. It’s very important that there are no ifs, no buts and no exceptions.”
 
Terrorism: “I don’t believe that you can sit down as leader of the Labour Party with organisations that support terror. No MP in my Labour Party would do that. I think there would have to be sanctions against someone who did that.”
 
Yvette Cooper: “It is hugely important that we never allow any dispute about decisions of the Israel government to become hostility to the Israeli state or the Israeli people. Anytime the peace process goes awry it can be the cause of rising anti-semitism in Britain. When that happened last summer, we were not fast enough to condemn it." 
 
Boycott: “We should be very clear about opposing a boycott. I don’t think it’s the right thing to do. It’s counter-productive.”
 
Jeremy Corbyn
Recognition: “I supported the recognition of the state of Palestine. There has to be a dialogue about the siege of Gaza, the settlement policy over the West Bank, about human rights and the treatment of Palestinian children and child prisoners. I’ve been on nine visits to Israel, the West Bank and Gaza.”
 
Boycott: “There are investigations going on into war crimes on both sides. Is it right that we should be supplying arms in this situation? Is it right that we are importing goods produced from illegal settlements across the West Bank?  Wouldn’t a stronger message be that a process of some economic measures might be helpful? That doesn’t mean there wouldn’t be intellectual relationships. I’m not in favour of preventing academic arrangements.  What I am in favour of is economic issues, particularly supplying arms and the importation of goods from settlements.”
 
Liz Kendall:
Recognition: “I came under a lot of pressure to support the vote in the House of Commons, not least from my own constituency, but I did abstain because I didn’t think it was the right thing to do. The way we achieve peace is through negotiation, not through passing resolutions in the House of Commons or the United Nations. I don’t believe we would have done that in government.”
 
Boycott: “I would want to fight [a boycott] with every fibre of my body.”
 

Sunday, 9 August 2015

Big welcome for Brent's Big Ride for Palestine participants





We went to welcome the Big Ride bikers on the completed of their Edinburgh to London fundrasing ride for Middle East Children's Alliance (MECA) at Archbishop's Parl, Lambeth this afternoon. They cycled 435 miles in 9 days.

Among the Brent riders were Kam Datta and Alberto Zerda. Kam raised more than £1000 and  Red Spokes, the organisers, hope that the total will reach £60,000.

You can still donate at


Kam has written about the project in the posting below. This is the statement on the Just giving website:
What is the problem the project is addressing?


Children in Gaza live with the constant threat of Israeli military assault and the ongoing blockade of basic necessities and medical care. There is widespread poverty and a closed environment where people and goods cannot travel freely. The UN estimates that 400,000 children in Gaza are showing signs of severe psychological distress including bed-wetting, nightmares, aggression, phobias, extreme withdrawal or anxiety and difficulty eating, sleeping or speaking.


How will this project solve the problem?


The situation for children in Gaza is an emergency. MECA will use your donations to provide emergency aid to families in Gaza and deliver medicine and medical supplies to hospitals. MECA will support community-based organisations that run creative writing programs, sports teams, art and music classes; to build playgrounds and much more. Meanwhile, The Big Ride is working to raise awareness in the UK about the situation for children in Gaza.


What is the potential long-term impact of this project?


This project will reduce the children's risk of disease and malnutrition by addressing basic needs for food, medical care and adequate shelter that could impact their development and long-term health. By involving children in creative community activities, the project will also protect children's long-term mental health, making them more resilient against the risks of severe anxiety, depression, aggression and withdrawal.

Well done to Kam, Alberto and all the other participants who ranged in aged from 14 to 80.

Friday, 24 July 2015

Pedalling for Pounds for Palestinian Children - Please Donate


A message from Kam:

I will be taking part in The Big Ride (Edinburgh to London - 435 miles) in August, to raise money for a Palestinian children's charity, specifically aiming to provide emergency aid for the children of Gaza.

After the war last summer the population of Gaza is still living under a siege which prevents adequate access to basic necessities. There is widespread povertyand a closed environment where people and goods cannot travel freely. In addition to malnutrition, the UN estimates that 400,000 children in Gaza are showing signs of severe psychological distress including bed-wetting, nightmares, aggression, phobias, extreme withdrawal or anxiety and difficulty eating, sleeping or speaking.

It would be great if you could sponsor me on the just giving page below (you may need to copy and paste into address bar) and maybe pass on details to others whomay be interested in donating to such a good cause:

https://www.justgiving.com/bikeykam

Thank you!

Saturday, 11 July 2015

BDS an issue for US Presidential hopefuls

From the US organisation Jewish Voices for Peace

Monday, major newspapers published a letter from Hillary Clinton to Democratic party mega-donor Haim Saban. In it, she weighed in on the growing Boycott, Divestment, and Sanctions movement - by committing to fight it. 

She wrote "to express my alarm over the Boycott, Divestment, and Sanctions movement....I know you agree that we need to make countering BDS a priority."
Similarly,Ted Cruz told the crowd at a recent Sheldon Adelson-funded event that "in 2017 we need a president who will stand up directly and confront the [BDS] movement."

Click here to tell all Presidential candidates: We support equal rights for all peoples of Palestine and Israel. And we're not alone.

The BDS movement is becoming a very public conversation topic in US politics. We know this grandstanding against BDS is first and foremost about the hunt for billionaire mega-donors - whether they be extreme right-wing fanatics like Sheldon Adelson, or Haim Saban, whose ultra-conservative streak is more specifically focused on opposing Palestinian rights.

Candidates need to know that selling out Palestinian rights doesn't curry any favor with us. Polls repeatedly show that growing numbers of all Americans - even and increasingly Jews—have had it with Israel’s endless settlement expansion, inequality, and denial of rights. They recognize that Israel is not interested in peace, and don’t want US policy to give Israel a free pass anymore.

If we raise our voices, there's actually reason to believe we can make a difference.

Just 4 months ago, working with many partner organizations, we helped convince 60 Members of Congress to boycott Netanyahu's speech to Congress. And days ago, a new survey showed only 48% of Democrats think Israel wants peace with its neighbors, while 47% think Israel is a racist country.

Sign here to show how many of us want an end to Israeli policies of occupation, official discrimination, and expulsion.

If we get 10,000 signatures, we'll deliver your message to all the candidates. 

This is a critical moment for broad education about what Israeli policies are doing, and how we can work with people around the globe to transform them. We need to seize it!

Wednesday, 8 July 2015

Dawn Butler tables parliamentary questions on Gaza siege and settler violence

In response to constituents' concerns Dawn Butler, MP for Brent Central, has tabled the following two parliamentary questions:

"What measures is the UK government currently taking to lift the blockade of Gaza, particularly with respect to ensuring the vital entry of humanitarian aid after the devastating attacks seen in 2014?"

"In the light of the UN reported recording of 221 incidents of settler violence with virtually no prosecutions, what discussions has the minister held with Israeli ministers over the failure to prosecute settlers for acts of violence against Palestinians?"

The questions are tabled for Tuesday July 14th and if not picked to be answered orally should receive written answers,

Dawn Butler has become Vice Chair of the Labour Friends of Palestine.

Thursday, 2 July 2015

Dawn Butler, Brent Central MP Meets Constituents to Discuss Palestine

Dawn Butler with lobbyists

As part of a national lobby day organised by the Palestine Solidarity Campaign (PSC) on 23 June 2015, recently elected Brent Central MP Dawn Butler met seven of her constituents in parliament to discuss various issues related to Palestine and British military and commercial ties with the state of Israel. 

During the PSC’s pre-election campaign, Ms Butler had provided assurances that she was pro-Palestinian and supported various measures in support of Palestinian human rights. During the meeting, which lasted around 30 minutes, she echoed such views, comparing the disparity in the balance of power between the Israelis and Palestinians and the effective situation on the ground to apartheid in South Africa. Ms Butler stated that the Israeli state has a right to defend itself but that its exercise of this right is disproportionate.

The Palestinian issue is of broad interest to residents in the north London borough of Brent across all communities, and constituents raised issues of concern to them and their fellow residents, including lifting the siege of Gaza, to allow the free movement of people, goods and humanitarian aid. Ms Butler agreed that the blockade should be lifted immediately, and agreed to sign related parliamentary motions on the issue.

Other issues raised include ending the arms trade with Israel and all military collaboration, including the sales of weapons and components, and taking steps to ensure products made in Israeli settlements, which Ms Butler agrees are illegal and unjustifiable, are not sold in the UK. On all issues, Ms Butler said she was willing to put questions to ministers and work with constituents on their concerns. She also said that she was planning to visit Gaza to see the situation for herself.

Friday, 5 June 2015

G4S challenged on Palestinian child prisoners and other human rights issues

I went along to the G4S Annual General Meeting protest earlier this week as a representative of Brent and Harrow PSC. It was a small but effective demonstration:

Monday, 20 April 2015

War, Peace & The Middle East: Brent Stop The War and Brent & Harrow Palestine Solidarity Campaign Election Meeting, 13th April 2015


By Aisha Maniar

Demonstrating that foreign policy issues and their implications on domestic issues are of concern to the electorate, over 80 local residents joined a packed out lively pre-election meeting organised by Brent Stop The War (STW) and Brent & Harrow Palestine Solidarity Campaign (PSC) with the Pakistan Community Centre in Willesden Green on Monday 13 April.

Questions had been submitted for candidates ahead of the meeting on various issues, including Trident renewal, the Iraq war, Israeli settlements, British torture complicity, relations with Saudi Arabia, Iran and Israel’s nuclear weapons and European relations with Israel.

The London Borough of Brent covers three constituencies: Brent North, Brent Central and Hampstead & Kilburn. As members of the two host organisations live in all three constituencies, five prospective Parliamentary candidates were invited from these constituencies, however Luke Parker, Conservative candidate for Brent North, had to cancel just days before and the party was not represented. Labour candidate for Hampstead & Kilburn Tulip Siddiq represented her party; the Liberal Democrats (Lib Dem) were represented by Brent Central’s Lauren Keith, speaking at her first such meeting since her recent appointment, and the recently-formed Trade Union and Socialist Coalition (TUSC) Party was represented by Brent Central candidate John Boyle. Due to a CND engagement at the same time, the Green Party was represented for the first half by Brent Central candidate and deputy party leader Shahrar Ali and for the second half by Hampstead & Kilburn candidate Rebecca Johnson, who was billed. Tulip Siddiq had to leave halfway through to attend another engagement. The meeting was capably chaired by Jane Shallice from the Stop The War Coalition.

The candidates were first asked about their views on Trident renewal and whether public funds should be used for this purpose when consecutive governments claim that there are insufficient funds for essential public services such as schools, hospitals and the fire service. The Labour and Lib Dem candidates did not oppose Trident renewal. Instead, Labour’s Tulip Siddiq stated that there was a need to look holistically at creating self-sufficient public services. Lauren Keith, while not against Trident, said there was a need to review Britain’s military capacity and aim for a de-escalation of nuclear arms.

On the other hand, Shahrar Ali and John Boyle, sitting on the opposite side of the female speakers, were both unequivocally for the scrapping of Trident altogether. Ali stated that there is no need for nuclear weapons at all and that the UK must honour its non-proliferation obligations under international law. He further stated that while men largely draw countries into war, it is the women and children both at home and abroad who suffer from these wars and as a result of cuts to public services made at the same time as increases to military budgets. Boyle stated that the government’s ability to renew Trident “exposes the lie of austerity”.

Concerning the Iraq War and current British military intervention there, Tulip Siddiq called Britain’s 2003 involvement in the invasion of the country “the biggest failing of the Labour government”. All the other candidates were also opposed to further British intervention in Iraq; Lauren Keith stated the region needs to be looked at more broadly and that Britain should consider talks with Iran and reviews its relations with Gulf states. Britain should be involved through diplomacy and negotiation. Shahrar Ali stated that reflection is also needed on state terrorism by the states involved in the conflict, such as the UK, and its ramifications on clampdowns on civil liberties at home and freedom of speech, especially for those who oppose government foreign policy. Instead of war, diplomatic avenues must be considered. John Boyle called the Iraq War “a war for resources” and stated that the UK’s close relationship with Saudi Arabia demonstrates that social justice is a false pretext for grabbing resources.

Commenting on claims and proven evidence of torture complicity against the British government, the Labour and Lib Dem candidates called for accountability and transparency. Lauren Keith called ‘secret courts’ rolled out by the ConDem government “dangerous territory”. Rebecca Johnson for the Green Party stated that soldiers are trained to lose their sense of morality and evidence of brutality and inhumane treatment is further proved through the increase in domestic violence when soldiers return home. Ms Johnson said that those responsible at all levels should be prosecuted and that there should be “no impunity whatsoever for anyone in war or peacetime”. She added that returning soldiers also needed therapy. John Boyle stated the police and army lack democratic accountability and that the problem was far from one of weeding out a few bad apples but of systemic abuse.

Questioned on their views on the Palestine and Israel conflict, the candidates were all unanimous that there should be a ban on the import and sale of Israeli settlement goods. There was also agreement that there was media bias in the reporting of the conflict and what Rebecca Johnson called the “invisibility” of the everyday suffering of Palestinians in the media. John Boyle said that it was up to politicians to combat this bias by using the stage they are given through their position and taking direct action to raise awareness. Lauren Keith suggested that social media was a tool available to politicians for such purposes.The candidates were less sure, however, on the question of how to deal with the current situation.

On the question of NATO membership, both the Greens and TUSC said that Britain should leave NATO whereas the Lib Dem candidate said we should remain a member. The candidates were also divided on the issue of Britain’s involvement in Ukraine and whether it should intervene further.

Asked about the impact of foreign policy issues closer to home, all of the candidates reported to be pro-immigration. Rebecca Johnson stated that the issue was not immigration but social inequality and that those are the issues that need to be tackled. With respect to radicalisation, Lauren Keith stated that the reasons for radicalisation are diverse and that greater transparency and honesty is needed in the political system to deal with it. Rebecca Johnson stated that one of the contributing factors driving young people to radicalisation is the closure of or lack of youth services as a result of increasing cuts. John Boyle stated that the issue was largely a colonial legacy and related to Islamophobia and the marginalisation of communities and racism of the British government.

The interest and depth of questions posed by those attending the meeting shows that, although governments tend to overlook public opinion on foreign policy, particularly where such opinions are opposed to war and militancy, these are certainly topics that concern and engage the public. What happens on these issues after 7th May remains to be seen.

Thank you to everyone who attended and to the Pakistan Community Centre for providing refreshments.


Friday, 3 April 2015

UPDATED: Brent candidates' views on Israel- Palestine - you decide

Ahead of the forthcoming hustings we have orga bised with Brent Stop the War (Pakistan Community Centre, Marley Walk, Station Road, Willesden Green - see posting below) you may be interested in how the local candidiates responded to questions from supporters of the Palestine Solidarity Campaign (When only a name has been given there has been no response as yet. Updates can be foud here: LINK)

BRENT CENTRAL

Shahrar Ali of the Green Party has responded.



  • They agree the UK Government should uphold the principles of equality, human rights and international law in all its relations and dealings with Israel.




  • They agree that the construction of Israeli settlements construction of Israeli settlements on occupied Palestinian land in the West Bank and East Jerusalem is illegal and unjustifiable.




  • They agree that one of the first acts of the next UK Government should be the recognition of Palestine.




  • They agree that the blockade of Gaza should be lifted immediately.




  • They agree that we should stop trade with Israel’s settlements on Palestinian land and stop settlement goods being sold in Britain.




  • They agree that the EU Israel Association should be suspended until Israel meets its human rights obligations.




  • They agree that the UK Government should stop supplying arms to Israel until it complies with international law.
  •  

  • The Green Party believes that the Arab-Israeli conflict persists owingto the failure to find a fair and humane solution to the problems of thePalestinian people; and at the same time offer appropriate guarantees ofsecurity for Israel.

    We condemned Israel's ground invasion and bombardment of Gaza in 2014,and continue to call on the UN, the EU and the US to ensure that Israel complies with international law.

    We also call on Israel to evacuate illegal settlements within the occupied territories of Palestine. In addition, we call on the government of Israel to dismantle the 'West Bank Barrier' which divides
    Palestinian territories, depriving Palestinians of land, water, and employment.

    The Green Party supports active participation in the boycott, divestment and sanctions campaign which aims to put pressure on the government of Israel to end the Occupation and to give equal rights to Palestinians.

    We believe that in the present situation neither the UK government nor UK companies should be selling arms to Israel.

    The Green Party is committed to principles of equality, human rights and international law. There can be no lasting peace without justice.'


    RE YOUR STATEMENTS

    1. I urge the UK Government to uphold the principles of equality, human rights and international law in all its relations and dealings with Israel.?Yes/no YES ?
    2. I consider the construction of Israeli settlements on occupied Palestinian land in the West Bank and East Jerusalem to be illegal andunjustifiable.?Yes/no YES ?? In achieving these principles, what are your views on the following steps that a future UK Government could take:?
    3. Do you agree that one of the first acts of the next UK Government should be the recognition of Palestine??Yes/no/don't know YES
    4. Do you agree that the blockade on Gaza should be lifted immediately??Yes/no/don't know YES ?
    5. Do you agree that we should stop trade with Israel's settlements on Palestinian land, and stop settlement goods being sold in Britain??Yes/no/don't know YES
    6. Do you agree that the EU Israel Association Agreement should besuspended until Israel meets its human rights obligations??Yes/no/don't know YES ?
    7. Do you agree that the government should stop supplying arms to Israel until it complies with international law??Yes/no/don't know YES

    Ibrahim Taguri who is an Indepdendent candidate has responded. (Please note Inrahim Taguri has now stepped down as a candidate)



  • They agree the UK Government should uphold the principles of equality, human rights and international law in all its relations and dealings with Israel.
    • Yes – Human rights and international law are the core of Liberal Democrat foreign policy. However, one of my great frustrations is watching all sides shift the fault lines of the argument to suit themselves at different moments. The first of these points relates to how Hamas and the Palestinian Authority are treated. As democratically elected representatives, they should be treated as such consistently. That means not only the recognition of a Palestinian state, but also holding them accountable to the same rules of international law as everyone else, including the Israeli government. I believe that Hamas in turn must change its charter in order to recognise the right of Israel to exist.



  • They agree that the construction of Israeli settlements construction of Israeli settlements on occupied Palestinian land in the West Bank and East Jerusalem is illegal and unjustifiable.
    • Yes – Israel will have to make painful territorial concessions in return for peace, including dismantling many settlements which have been built on occupied territories. There is precedence for this, such as Israel’s return of the whole of Sinai to Egypt in 1979 and complete withdrawal from Gaza (including the destruction of all of its settlements) in 2005. I am, however, concerned about the unwillingness of the Netenyahu administration to be prepared to make such concessions again in return for a genuine and lasting peace. Equally, Hamas must immediately recognise the legitimacy of the Israeli state and the right of its citizens to live in safety and without fear.




  • They agree that one of the first acts of the next UK Government should be the recognition of Palestine.
    • Yes – Please see here for my full views on this issue. We should be supporting the creation of conditions to make a Palestinian state viable over a certain time frame, once certain basic obligations are met. And Israel should also be held to account to help ensure the state is viable.




  • They agree that the blockade of Gaza should be lifted immediately.
    • Yes – I believe that humanitarian concerns outweigh any fears of a rearmed Hamas renewing the conflict. Hamas must be urged to behave as a democratically elected Party and commit to the points I have already highlighted. There must be an end to blockades and the fullest possible economic development of Gaza. This applies as much to blockade at the Egyptian side of the tunnels. I would call for the implementation of an inspection regime that could ensure the flow of goods into Gaza for humanitarian purposes while ensuring nothing is diverted towards Hamas's military programme




  • They agree that we should stop trade with Israel’s settlements on Palestinian land and stop settlement goods being sold in Britain.
    • Yes & No – Trade with illegal settlements should cease, as this undermines the rule of international law in pursuing a lasting peace process. However, I am not in favour of either cultural or economic boycotts generally.




  • They do not answer directly as to whether they support the suspension of the EU Israel Association Agreement





  • They agree that the UK Government should stop supplying arms to Israel until it complies with international law.
    • He adds: This is really a question about the ethical nature of the UK arms trade. We should not trade arms with governments around the world that do not represent British values of equality, freedom and tolerance, such as Saudi Arabia and indeed the US drone programme.

  • Thank you for writing to me regarding the ongoing situation in Israel and Palestine.
    Like you I am distressed and concerned over the direction of this conflict during this past year, not least because of the aftershocks felt around the world, including here in Britain, where tension is stoked between communities living side by side.

    You have raised some important questions and I hope you will forgive the length of my response. I feel it is important that you receive a thorough, clear and detailed set of answers.

    I have entered politics in order to make a difference to my community and country. I have also entered it with an open heart and an open mind. As a British born Libyan with Palestinian heritage, I feel the pain acutely of what is going on. I have lost family members due to the actions of previous Israeli governments as well as more recently at the hands of ISIS and Al-Qaeda.

    I believe that a constructive and lasting peace will only be achieved through a two-state solution, requiring both Israel and Palestine to make significant compromises to ensure that the rights of both are protected and respected.


    Dawn Butler of the Labour Party has responded.

    ·         They agree the UK Government should uphold the principles of equality, human rights and international law in all its relations and dealings with Israel.
    ·         They agree that the construction of Israeli settlements construction of Israeli settlements on occupied Palestinian land in the West Bank and East Jerusalem is illegal and unjustifiable.
    ·         They agree that one of the first acts of the next UK Government should be the recognition of Palestine.
    ·         'We are clear that Palestinian recognition at the UN would be such a step.'
    ·         They agree that the blockade of Gaza should be lifted immediately.
    ·         They agree that we should stop trade with Israel’s settlements on Palestinian land and stop settlement goods being sold in Britain.
    ·         They agree that the EU Israel Association should be suspended until Israel meets its human rights obligations.
    ·         They agree that the UK Government should stop supplying arms to Israel until it complies with international law.


    Thank you for your email, my response to all of your questions are yes.

    I share your concern at the lack of progr ess on the Middle East Peace Process and the
    issue of Palestinian human rights.

    I fully support two states living side by side in peace, and recognised by all of their
    neighbours. After decades of diplomatic failure, there are those on all sides that today
    question whether a two-state solution is any longer possible.

    Despite John Kerry’s exhaustive efforts in 2013, the latest round of negotiations
    collapsed in April last year. However the appalling loss of life that occurred in the
    conflict in Gaza last summer – with 2,131 Palestinians killed, the vast majority of them
    civilians, and seven Israeli civilians killed by rocket attacks from Gaza-makes the task of
    achieving a lasting and just peace all the more urgent.

    Labour is clear that only a negotiated peace deal will bring the justice and security both
    sides deserve. That is why the international community must now take concrete steps to
    strengthen moderate Palestinian opinion. We are clear that Palestinian recognition at
    the UN would be such a step.

    Palestinian statehood is not a gift to be given but a right to be recognised and that is
    why, in both 2011 and in 2012, Labour urged the UK Government to support the
    Palestinian’s bid for recognition at the UN. Not as a means of bypassing the need for
    talks, but as a bridge for restarting them. Today, the immediate priority for the
    international community must be to ensure that humanitarian aid reaches the thousands of Palestinians who are in desperate need, and to help the rebuilding of basic infrastructure in Gaza.

    All sides must avoid taking action that would make peace harder to achieve, that means an end to blockade and occupation, and the end of rocket and terror attacks. Labour recognises that the settlements and their continued expansion remain key obstacles to resolving the conflict, as Ed Miliband has said, they are both illegal and immoral. Labour
    has taken and will maintain domestic action to introduce labelling transparency, and will seek a Europe-wide approach to settlement products.

    And finally, I think that an important part of the long term solution is to empower the new generation to strive for peace and unity. There are some great organisations who are aspiring to do that like One Voice.

    Lauren Keith of the Liberal Democrats
     
    -->
    I urge the UK Government to uphold the principles of equality, human rights and international law in all its relations and dealings with Israel.
    I agree. I was disturbed by our Government’s weak response to the Israel-Gaza conflict last summer, but pleased that senior Lib Dems such as Nick Clegg and Paddy Ashdown raised their concerns that the Prime Minister wasn’t taking forthright action. As a recognised state Israel should not be allowed to think it is above the international law that other countries adhere to.  If Ireland started rocketing Wales and the UK Government responded with a full scale attack that killed civilians, there would be international outrage and condemnation. Not a few words calling for peace, limited action and tacit support from US Congress. There would be consequences. 
    Similarly, the UK Government needs to make it clear to Netanyahu that if international and human rights law is breached then there will be actions taken on our part. Obvious one being a ban on arms exports. There needs to be a marker down as to what is and what is not acceptable.  Certainly Israel needs to take action against rocket attacks but this should be proportionate and isolated. It is also highly counter-productive in the long term for large scale military attacks to be used as it perpetuates the cycle of violence.

    I consider the construction of Israeli settlements on occupied Palestinian land in the West Bank and East Jerusalem to be illegal and unjustifiable.
    Yes. These settlements are illegal and they make finding a two-state peace settlement even harder. At the Liberal Democrat conference last October we passed a motion which called for the UK to “apply continued pressure on the Israeli Government to cease its illegal acquisition of land in the West Bank.”

    In achieving these principles, what are your views on the following steps that a future UK Government could take:

    Do you agree that one of the first acts of the next UK Government should be the recognition of Palestine?
    Like most Liberal Democrats, I believe the UK Government should encourage the EU to recognise the State of Palestine. When MPs voted on recognising Palestine I was delighted to see Liberal Democrat MPs overwhelmingly supported it. The UK Government has said it will continue to support a negotiated two-state solution and will work with other countries to secure one. I was pleased that they said they look forward to recognising a democratic, sovereign and viable Palestinian state when it will help the peace process most. I hope this can be achieved soon.

    Do you agree that the blockade on Gaza should be lifted immediately?
    Yes. The UK Ambassador in Israel has been raising this with senior Israeli Government officials since the ceasefire in Gaza last summer. We (the lib dems) have been calling for the blockade on Gaza to be lifted and for trade routes to be reopened. The UK has also been working with the EU and UN to put pressure on Israel for this to happen, while recognising their legitimate security concerns. The blockade is affecting the lives and rights of civilians and jeopardising the economic future of the area.

    Do you agree that we should stop trade with Israel's settlements on Palestinian land, and stop settlement goods being sold in Britain?
    I think our Government has been right to support the voluntary guidelines so that customers can identify whether goods come from the Occupied Palestinian Territories and make a decision for themselves if they want to buy them. However, given that Netanyahu has made it clear that he is wanting to carry on with his hard line towards Palestine, I think that ending trade may be a good way of sending a strong signal and putting down the markers of acceptability.

    Do you agree that the EU Israel Association Agreement should be suspended until Israel meets its human rights obligations?
    No. The EU-Israel Association Agreement allows the EU to regularly raise human rights concerns with Israel and work to address these. However, I think the EU should review its Association Agreement to consider whether Israel continues to uphold peace and human rights. The Association should demonstrate more teeth in taking action through trade and investment links to deter military actions being taken by Israel.

    Do you agree that the government should stop supplying arms to Israel until it complies with international law?
    The UK reviewed the issue of our arms exports to Israel last year, and I was pleased that the Coalition Government said it would suspend the relevant licenses to Israel if hostilities restart and would revoke any licenses that undermine the peace process. Netanyahu needs to know that if a similar attack to last summer is started, then arms exports will immediately be stopped.
    Israel has also been listed as a country of concern in the UK Government’s Human Rights and Democracy Report and we (Lib Dems) believe that there should be a presumption of denial when considering whether to grant arms export licenses for equipment bound for countries that are listed in that report.
    In my view the priority now must be to restart peace talks as quickly as possible to bring an end to the violence, improve the lives of ordinary Palestinians and ensure Israel’s security.
     

    John Boyle of TUSC

    Stephen Priestley of UKIP
    HAMPSTEAD AND KILBURN 

     Rebecca Johnson of the Green Party has responded.



  • They agree the UK Government should uphold the principles of equality, human rights and international law in all its relations and dealings with Israel.




  • They agree that the construction of Israeli settlements construction of Israeli settlements on occupied Palestinian land in the West Bank and East Jerusalem is illegal and unjustifiable.




  • They agree that one of the first acts of the next UK Government should be the recognition of Palestine.




  • They agree that the blockade of Gaza should be lifted immediately.




  • They agree that we should stop trade with Israel’s settlements on Palestinian land and stop settlement goods being sold in Britain.




  • They do not have enough information to say whether or not they support the suspension of the EU Israel Association Agreement




  • They support a complete ban on global arms trade but do not refer specifically to Israel.
    • 'I am opposed to all arms sales.'

  • Thank you for your email.
    Like you I was very concerned about the bombings of Gaza and the appalling deaths that ensued,
    as well as ongoing settlements and violations of Palestinian human rights.

    I am committed to nonviolence and have participated in Women in Black for over 20 years,
    which brought together Israeli and Palestinian women - and many others from around the world -
    to oppose the Occupation. I joined Stop the War demos against the continued bombing of Gaza,
    and continue to stand with Women in Black at vigils in London where we make clear our support
    for Palestinian human rights and hold placards stating "Only justice for Palestinians can bring
    peace to Israelis". I have also joined Palestinian women in protesting against checkpoints and
    the terrible dividing Wall, and was subjected to teargas attacks when protesting against the wall
    at Bil'in a few years ago.

    With that in mind, my responses to your questions are below.

    I hope that is helpful.
    all best wishes,
    Rebecca

    Tulip Siddiq of the Labour Party has responded.



  • They agree the UK Government should uphold the principles of equality, human rights and international law in all its relations and dealings with Israel.




  • They agree that the construction of Israeli settlements construction of Israeli settlements on occupied Palestinian land in the West Bank and East Jerusalem is illegal and unjustifiable.




  • They agree that one of the first acts of the next UK Government should be the recognition of Palestine.




  • They do not directly answer whether or not they supported the lifting of the blockade.




  • They disagree that we should stop trade with Israel’s settlements.




  • They do not agree that the EU Israel Association Agreement should be suspended.




  • They do not agree with a complete suspension of arms sales to Israel, but think that arms sales should be reviewed.
  •  

  • Thank you getting in touch to ask for my views on the Israel-Gaza conflict last year.
    As you mention in your email, the conflict resulted in a tragic death toll that included many
    civilians. Whilst a truce is now of course in place, the prospect of a lasting peace seems
    depressingly distant.

    I hope that you will allow me to give you a detailed response to your questions as opposed to
    simply ticking yes or no to each particular point.

    I do of course believe that the UK Government should uphold the principles of equality, human
    rights and international law in all its relations and dealings with Israel and with the Palestinians –
    as it should in all circumstances in its foreign policy around the world.

    Regarding the construction of settlements and the blockade of Gaza I agree with the comments
    Ed Miliband made last April on his visit to Israel. He stated that Israel’s policy on settlements is
    “wrong and illegal” and that the current move to extend settlements actively endangers the
    viability of a future Palestinian state and the chances of a two-state solution. I am against the
    expansion of settlements and believe that they are an obstacle to peace. The issue of settlements
    however is one where in the past Israel has shown an ability to compromise – for example when
    Israel dismantled settlements in the Gaza strip in 2005 – and so it is a point on which the
    international community could push for significant changes with reasonable hope of success. I
    also agree that counter-productive blockades on Gaza should be lifted, just as Hamas's military
    wing and other militant groups should cease their counter-productive terrorist attacks on civilians
    in Southern Israel.

    In terms of the UK Government recognising Palestine as a state, the Labour Party made its
    position clear in October when Labour MPs forced a vote in the House of Commons on
    recognition of Palestine - a motion I would have supported. Clearly, such a vote by itself will not
    bring about the changes we want - we need to build on it by redoubling our efforts to work with
    both parties towards a lasting, negotiated agreement that will actualise the viable Palestinian state
    we want to see.

    In relation to a potential boycott of goods produced in Israeli settlements in the West Bank, I
    know that current Foreign Office guidance states there are "clear risks related to economic and
    financial activities within the settlements" and that the British Government "do not encourage or
    offer support to such activity." I do not support a complete boycott because I worry that isolation
    will not be an effective way of bringing about peace; and there is also evidence they have been
    detrimental to Palestinians in the past.

    I also looked at the EU Israel Association Agreement that you mention. At 154 pages it is a
    complicated document but overall I support cooperation between the EU and Israel on the same
    basis that I do not feel isolation is a productive strategy.

    Your final question relates to British arms supplies. The bleak picture in so many countries to
    which the UK has supplied arms has highlighted the need to review and toughen Britain's arms
    regulations. Following conflicts like the one between Israel and Hamas, particularly given the
    high civilian death toll, I think that the UK Government should look at whether its arms export
    licence criteria (the "Consolidated Criteria") are in breach, and no new arms export licenses
    should be issued in cases where there is doubt about the end-use of military equipment. In the
    future, I think there needs to be much greater Parliamentary scrutiny of Britain's arms export
    system so that Parliament can investigate arms deals before the exports take place rather than
    retrospectively, as is the case at present. It almost goes without saying that we need to continue
    to work with international partners to prevent the supply of military funding and arms to
    proscribed terrorist organisations, including those operating in the Middle East.

    These are all important aspects of a complex and often fast-changing situation in the Middle
    East. I've shared my current thoughts with you in this email, but should stress that they are topics
    on which I am open to dialogue, open to new information coming to light, and open to new,
    constructive ways to improve the lives of people in the region.

    Maajid Nawaz of the Liberal Democrats

    Magnus Nielsen of UKIP


    BRENT NORTH

    Luke Parker of the Conservative Party has responded.



  • They did not reply to the questions about whether they would urge the UK Government to uphold the principles of equality, human rights and international law in all its relations and dealings with Israel.




  • They do not reply to the question about whether the construction of Israeli settlements construction of Israeli settlements on occupied Palestinian land in the West Bank and East Jerusalem is illegal and unjustifiable.




  • They agree with the recognition of Palestine only following successful negotiations with Israel.




  • They do not directly answer whether or not they supported the lifting of the blockade.




  • They do not answer the question on whether we should stop trade with Israel’s settlements.




  • They do not answer directly as to whether they support the suspension of the EU Israel Association Agreement




  • They did not directly the answer the question on whether or not the Government should stop supplying arms to Israel until it complies with international law.
  •  

  • Firstly, thank you for getting in touch. I have received a number of similar enquiries and
    I know this is an issue about which a great number of Brent North residents have strong
    opinions.

    I grew up in 1980s London, a proud Englishman and also a Catholic of Irish
    descent. This was a time when Irish Catholics were still bombing London and British
    soldiers still patrolled the streets of Northern Ireland. I fully understand how two races
    of good people can find themselves locked in a cycle of hatred and violence.
    For me, the first enemy of peace is dwelling upon history. In the 1980s it was about
    Imperial Britain on one side and a country's right to defend itself from attack on the
    other. Those who got locked into that debate did nothing to help the actual citizens of
    these two islands, they simply cemented the dispute for future generations.
    There were a small, often forgotten, group of others who focused not on who had done
    what, and when, but rather looked forward and asked questions such as: "how do we
    build a place where both our people can live in peace?", "how do we end the
    occupation?", "how do we end the terror?". It was the efforts of those people that
    eventually led to the peace we now know; they are the people who encouraged the men
    of violence to take the difficult steps towards dialogue; they are the reason that you and
    I don't have to fear car bombs as we walk around the streets of London; they are the
    reason that people in Northern Ireland no longer have checkpoints at the end of their
    roads.

    This should be the role we look to emulate in the Israel/Palestine conflict: ensuring the
    current ceasefire is successful, opposing the extension of Israeli settlements, alleviating
    humanitarian suffering in Gaza and achieving a sustainable solution that will allow the
    Palestinians and the Israelis to live in peace and security.

    I’m proud of the fact that the Conservative Government has given over £17 million in aid
    to the Palestinian people since September 2014 and it is vital that Gaza’s civilian
    population is protected. Like my party, I am of the opinion that a negotiated two-state
    solution is the only way to resolve the long-term issues in the region and I will personally
    position myself with anyone who seeks to promote peace and find a way in which Israel
    can protect itself without hurting innocent Palestinians.


    With best wishes,

    Luke Parker

    Scott Bartle of the Green Party has responded.



  • They agree the UK Government should uphold the principles of equality, human rights and international law in all its relations and dealings with Israel.




  • They agree that the construction of Israeli settlements construction of Israeli settlements on occupied Palestinian land in the West Bank and East Jerusalem is illegal and unjustifiable.




  • They agree that one of the first acts of the next UK Government should be the recognition of Palestine.




  • They agree that the blockade of Gaza should be lifted immediately.




  • They agree that we should stop trade with Israel’s settlements on Palestinian land and stop settlement goods being sold in Britain.




  • They agree that the EU Israel Association should be suspended until Israel meets its human rights obligations.




  • They agree that the UK Government should stop supplying arms to Israel until it complies with international law.
  •  

  • My mum was campaigning for the Human Rights of Palestinians before I was born. It is
    unacceptable that over three decades later there is still no resolution. As a graduate of Human
    Rights, I believe that it is important that our government starts to look at its foreign policy and
    how it is treating people across the world. Our foreign policy needs a complete reboot and its
    imperative that historical inconsistency due to our colonial past is readdressed. Wherever there is
    conflict in the world, the 'west' has had a hand historically in it and this is unacceptable.
    I believe that we should have a foreign policy based upon Human Rights principles that are
    applied consistently across the world. This is one of the reasons I joined The Green Party.

    The Green Party believes that the Arab-Israeli conflict persists owing to the failure to find a fair
    and humane solution to the problems of the Palestinian people; and at the same time offer
    appropriate guarantees of security for Israel.

    We condemned Israel's ground invasion and bombardment of Gaza in 2014, and continue to call
    on the UN, the EU and the US to ensure that Israel complies with international law.

    We also call on Israel to evacuate illegal settlements within the occupied territories of Palestine.
    In addition, we call on the government of Israel to dismantle the 'West Bank Barrier' which
    divides Palestinian territories, depriving Palestinians of land, water, and employment.

    The Green Party supports active participation in the boycott, divestment and sanctions campaign
    which aims to put pressure on the government of Israel to end the Occupation and to give equal
    rights to Palestinians.

    We believe that in the present situation neither the UK government nor UK companies should be
    selling arms to Israel.

    The Green Party is committed to principles of equality, human rights and international law.
    There can be no lasting peace without justice.'

    With reference to your statements:

    I urge the UK Government to uphold the principles of equality, human rights and international
    law in all its relations and dealings with Israel.
    Yes
    I consider the construction of Israeli settlements on occupied Palestinian land in the West Bank
    and East Jerusalem to be illegal and unjustifiable.
    Yes

    In achieving these principles, what are your views on the following steps that a future UK
    Government could take:
    Do you agree that one of the first acts of the next UK Government should be the recognition of
    Palestine?
    Yes
    Do you agree that the blockade on Gaza should be lifted immediately?
    Yes
    Do you agree that we should stop trade with Israel's settlements on Palestinian land, and stop
    settlement goods being sold in Britain?
    Yes
    Do you agree that the EU Israel Association Agreement should be suspended until Israel meets
    its human rights obligations?
    Yes
    Do you agree that the government should stop supplying arms to Israel until it complies with
    international law?
    Yes

    Barry Gardiner of the Labour Party has responded.



  • They agree the UK Government should uphold the principles of equality, human rights and international law in all its relations and dealings with Israel.




  • They agree that the construction of Israeli settlements construction of Israeli settlements on occupied Palestinian land in the West Bank and East Jerusalem is illegal and unjustifiable.




  • They agree that one of the first acts of the next UK Government should be the recognition of Palestine.




  • They agree that the blockade of Gaza should be lifted immediately.




  • They disagree that we should stop trade with Israel’s settlements.




  • They do not agree that the EU Israel Association Agreement should be suspended.




  • They do not agree that the UK Government should stop supplying arms to Israel, as they think that the current restrictions on arms’ licences are adequate and Israel has a right to defend itself


  • Paul Lorber of the Liberal Democrats

    Martin Ferguson of UKIP